An SEO glossary of terms every marketer should know in 2026
A practical, current glossary covering the essential SEO terminology every marketer should be comfortable with, from foundational concepts to 2026-specific terms.
6 min read
E-E-A-T — Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness — is the framework Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines use to evaluate content quality, particularly for topics that can genuinely affect a reader's health, finances or safety. It is not a single ranking factor with its own score, but it meaningfully shapes how many existing signals get weighted.
Added in December 2022, Experience asks whether the content creator has actual, first-hand experience with the topic — having genuinely used the product, visited the place, or gone through the situation being described. This recognises that lived experience is itself a distinct, valuable form of credibility, separate from formal expertise.
Expertise asks whether the content demonstrates genuine, deep knowledge of the subject, whether through formal qualifications or extensive practical experience. A doctor writing about a medical condition and an experienced mechanic writing about car repair can both demonstrate genuine expertise, in different but equally valid ways.
Authoritativeness asks whether other credible sources — other experts, publications, or the wider web — recognise your site or author as a go-to source on the topic. This is reflected partly through backlinks and mentions from other authoritative sources, and partly through a consistent, recognisable reputation in the specific field.
Authoritativeness cannot be claimed on your own page — it has to be reflected by how other credible sources on the wider web talk about you.
Google has stated trustworthiness is the most important of the four elements, since even highly expert, authoritative content is worthless if it is inaccurate, deceptive or unsafe. Trust signals include accurate information, secure browsing, transparent sourcing, clear disclosure of sponsored or affiliate relationships, and honest, unmanipulated content generally.
Named authors with genuine, verifiable credentials and bios; clear sourcing and citations for factual claims; transparent business information; and, for YMYL content, a visible review process by a qualified professional. Google's full Search Quality Rater Guidelines are worth reading directly for the complete picture.
No, it is a framework guiding how Google's systems and human quality raters evaluate content, influencing many existing signals rather than existing as one standalone, directly measurable score.
Yes — E-E-A-T rewards genuine expertise and experience regardless of site size, and a small site with a credible, well-credentialed author on a narrow topic can demonstrate this as convincingly as a much larger publisher.
Google has specifically stated trustworthiness is the most critical of the four, since it underlies whether the other three elements can be relied upon at all.
If you want help auditing your site's author credentials, sourcing and trust signals against this framework, talk to our team.
Add a real, named author bio with genuine credentials to every substantive page on your site — this single change touches all four elements of E-E-A-T at once and is one of the highest-leverage trust improvements available.
Written by Fibvo — Bengaluru and Erode, India — working with clients in other time zones. Questions, or think we have it wrong? Tell us.
Keep reading
A practical, current glossary covering the essential SEO terminology every marketer should be comfortable with, from foundational concepts to 2026-specific terms.
6 min readA practical framework for building one content strategy that serves both traditional search ranking and AI answer engine visibility simultaneously.
6 min readWhat the Quality Rater Guidelines actually are, how human raters use them, and the practical lessons worth extracting from this lengthy public document.
5 min readNext step
Send the problem in a paragraph. We will reply within one working day with an honest view of whether we can help, and what it is likely to cost.