An SEO glossary of terms every marketer should know in 2026
A practical, current glossary covering the essential SEO terminology every marketer should be comfortable with, from foundational concepts to 2026-specific terms.
6 min read
Review and AggregateRating structured data can produce the visible star rating snippets appearing directly in search results, a genuinely valuable, attention-grabbing rich result — but Google enforces strict, specific eligibility requirements around its use.
How the schema works
AggregateRating schema summarises a rating value and review count for an entity (typically a product, service or business), while Review schema can represent individual review content — both need to genuinely reflect real reviews visible on the actual page.
Eligibility requirements worth knowing
- The reviews being marked up must be genuinely visible and accessible on the actual page.
- Self-serving reviews about your own business, written by you, generally do not qualify.
- The schema must accurately reflect the actual rating and review count, not an inflated or cherry-picked version.
What counts as misuse
Marking up a rating that does not correspond to genuine, visible reviews, applying review schema to an entire category or organisation rather than the specific item actually being reviewed, or inflating the displayed rating relative to actual review data are all violations that can result in losing rich result eligibility, sometimes site-wide.
A star rating in search results is a powerful trust signal precisely because it usually reflects something genuine — misusing the schema to fake that signal is exactly the kind of shortcut Google actively polices.
Where reviews should genuinely come from
Third-party review platforms, verified purchase reviews, or your own site's genuine customer review system (with real, verifiable submissions) are all legitimate sources — self-written testimonials without a genuine, verifiable review process do not meet Google's actual standard.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use review schema for my organisation as a whole, not a specific product?
Google has specifically restricted self-serving organisation-level review schema in many cases — check current structured data guidelines carefully before implementing this specific use case.
What happens if review schema is misused?
Google can revoke rich result eligibility for the affected markup, and in more serious or repeated cases, this can extend to a broader loss of structured data rich result eligibility across the site.
Do I need a minimum number of reviews to use this schema?
There is no official minimum, but the reviews and rating displayed must genuinely, accurately reflect what actually exists and is visible on the page.
If you want help implementing review schema correctly and safely, contact our team.
The takeaway
Only implement review schema for genuine, verifiable reviews you can actually display on the page — misuse is one of the more actively enforced structured data violations and can cost you rich result eligibility site-wide.
Written by Fibvo — Bengaluru and Erode, India — working with clients in other time zones. Questions, or think we have it wrong? Tell us.
Keep reading
Related articles
A hybrid SEO strategy for a world with both blue links and AI answers
A practical framework for building one content strategy that serves both traditional search ranking and AI answer engine visibility simultaneously.
6 min readGoogle's Quality Rater Guidelines explained, in plain language
What the Quality Rater Guidelines actually are, how human raters use them, and the practical lessons worth extracting from this lengthy public document.
5 min readNext step
Tell us what you are trying to grow.
Send the problem in a paragraph. We will reply within one working day with an honest view of whether we can help, and what it is likely to cost.